Ilford Fp4 Vs Hp5

I had a really similar journey to this fi as well I was a die hard HP5 guy for a long time, shot the occasional roll of FP4, but never thought much of it Sometime last year I found an old roll of FP4 that I had forgotten about, popped it iny GR10 and fell in love.

Ilford fp4 vs hp5. The choice between Ilford FP4 Plus in a speed increasing developer, or Ilford HP5 Plus in a finegrain developer, is therefore likely to be a choice based on grain and tonality rather than on the speed difference, which might be 1/3 stop or less. Specifically, you've got 4 different films within the Kodak vs Ilford ISO 100 contest;. Is one better than the other?.

Leica MA, 50mm Summicron, f/2, 1/500, Ilford HP5 ISO 1600 Here’s a photo shot with Ilford FP4 ISO 125 in 500ml of 68F, 1100 Rodinal stand developed for an hour You can see the fine detail and sharpness, but the bokeh area has a bit of grain Leica MA, 50mm Summicron, f/2, 1/500, Ilford FP4 ISO 125. The choice between Ilford FP4 Plus in a speed increasing developer, or Ilford HP5 Plus in a finegrain developer, is therefore likely to be a choice based on grain and tonality rather than on the speed difference, which might be 1/3 stop or less. EDIT – September 17 – Please note that the reciprocity adjustments featured in this blog post, have been superceded by new information from Ilford – see here I mentioned in an earlier blog post that I had made some pinhole images using Ilford FP4 without accurately adjusting for reciprocity failure My quick fix for pinholes has been to switch to Fuji Acros, which requires no.

From those three, I'd recommend Ilford FP4 for slower (it's ISO 125 and I think it's probably the best B&W film ever made) and for higher ISO Kodak TriX (ISO 400) or failing that, TMax 400 TMax has more grain but TriX has nicer tones. Ilford HP5 400 B&W Film Profile/Review This tech page is for Ilford HP5 Film, or HP5PLUS This is a high speed B&W film that comes in 35mm roll, 1 roll, and various sheet sizes It is a panchromatic black and white negative film with a nominal rating of ISO 400. Ilford FP4 vs Delta 100 Discussion in 'Film and Processing' started by andy_buck1, Apr , 19 andy_buck1 I have shot TriX400 for decades and love it But I need a slower film at the moment Which of these two does anybody think is closest to TriX 400 in terms of smoothness of tonalities?.

Ilford FP4 (now FP4) is known for being versatile, with usable results even when underexposed two stops or overexposed by up to six stops It also develops very easily even if you mess up the temperatures of chemical concentrations which is why it is a very popular film for teaching students. This time I used 35mm FP4 which I shot in my Leica M2 with the 7Artisans 35mm f/2 lens, and 1 HP5 in my Yashica 124G This time I wanted to try a more thorough test so for each scene I shoot both film at box speed, the underexposed by ~one and then two stops I ending up shooting the FP4 at 125, 0 and 400 and the HP5 at 400, 800 and 1600 ISO. I had a really similar journey to this fi as well I was a die hard HP5 guy for a long time, shot the occasional roll of FP4, but never thought much of it Sometime last year I found an old roll of FP4 that I had forgotten about, popped it iny GR10 and fell in love.

I've been mainly using FP4 since I started processing my own film a few years ago I've always been happy with it, but am wanting to add HP5 to my repetoire Other than its faster speed, what other situations would I want to use it over FP4?. Posted by James 4 May 16 29 Apr 16 Leave a comment on 4×5 Roses HP5 vs FP4 A couple of months ago, I loaded up a bunch of film 3 holders full of HP5 and 2 of FP4 I shot one holder of HP5 maybe a month ago, but they were horribly misfocused and not correctly exposed. I always thought FP4 was lacking in character, but Big Will has proved me wrong on that However, I always thought HP5 in Rodinal was full of character, and is one of my alltime favourites Pan F is capable of wonderful results in a very different area, IR films are terrific, and if Ilford can be persuaded to make SFX again, it's a superb film.

Ilford FP4 Plus For high quality black and white photography, ILFORD FP4 PLUS is unrivalled Its very fine grain, outstanding sharpness and More info Ilford HP5 Plus ILFORD HP5 PLUS is a high speed, medium contrast film making it especially suitable for action and press photography and also More info Ilford Ortho Plus. Leica MA, 50mm Summicron, f/2, 1/500, Ilford HP5 ISO 1600 Here’s a photo shot with Ilford FP4 ISO 125 in 500ml of 68F, 1100 Rodinal stand developed for an hour You can see the fine detail and sharpness, but the bokeh area has a bit of grain Leica MA, 50mm Summicron, f/2, 1/500, Ilford FP4 ISO 125. Ilford FP4 vs TMax 100 I bought 3 rolls of Ilford FP4 35mm plus to try it again (Ilford FP4 vs Kodak TMax 100 film I used mostly in 1314) I decided to load a roll in my 1950s Leica M3, with Leica Noctilux 50mm f10 v2 lens at f1 The FP4 plus film was developed at box speed in 1100 Rodinal, semi stand developed for 45 minute at 21 degrees.

Welcome to the Ilford film group Members may add five photos per week to the pool Photos must be shot with Ilford film and an appropriate tag would be very much appreciated NO DIGITAL!. See our other post on comparing 35mm format film Kodak TriX vs Ilford HP5 35mm films Reply Pushing and Pulling Film A Complete Guide from The Darkroom says March 10, 19 at 11 am Recommended film stock to try – TriX 400 & Ilford HP5 plus Kodak TriX or Ilford HP5 – See a comparison of the two films. Introduction Spending some time with Google shows that there are numerous comparisons between Kodak TriX (400TX) and Ilford's HP5 film Are they the same?.

FP4 is a slower film (125iso where as HP5 is 400iso) Meaning it requires more light to get an image For example, HP5 is very good as an every day film where as FP4 is better for brighter days The. To get the look I wanted I came away committed to shooting ILFORD HP5 PLUS, exposed at EI 250, developed at 400 or pushed to 1600, using Kodak D76 (and the chart on the wall) But for whatever reason, I had only really ever shot one 100 speed black and white film. IlFord FP4 125 Ilford PanF 50 Ilford Delta 100 So I guess most of you guys know already, I'm using these down in Utah/Arizona where it's going to be really sunny Please tell me which type I should use, I can't decide Any help at all would be really welcome Thanks.

Plux X vs FP4 and Tmax100 vs Delta 100 PlusX vs FP4 are rated at ISO125 and the other 2 are rated at ISO100 The first 2 are older style silver grained and the latter 2 are tabular grained newer technology All 4 films offer different results depending. Posts about Ilford FP4 written by kevinallan FilmPhotographyBlog The blog previously known as kevinthephotographer filmsnotdead flowers fomapan fomapan 100 fp4 fuji Fujifim GA645Zi HC110 Hebrides Heritage Holga ilford Ilford FP4 ilford hp5 Ilford Pan F Infrared Intrepid kodak Kodak Portra 400 Kodak TMax Lake landscape Large Format. Ilford FP4 vs TMax 100 I bought 3 rolls of Ilford FP4 35mm plus to try it again (Ilford FP4 vs Kodak TMax 100 film I used mostly in 1314) I decided to load a roll in my 1950s Leica M3, with Leica Noctilux 50mm f10 v2 lens at f1 The FP4 plus film was developed at box speed in 1100 Rodinal, semi stand developed for 45 minute at 21 degrees.

The other film is HP5) From my testing, it's close to the same speed as TriX 3, so I'm not losing much in the transition Its look is pretty similar to TriX as well I'm also more confident in the longevity of Ilford/Harman than Kodak at this point, so I'll put my dollars where they'll do me the most good. Probably HP5 for silver prints and FP4 for alt processes requiring a high CI If I had to pick one, it would be HP5, for the lower contrast and twospeed advantage. Ilford hp5 Minolta Autocord James Ley James Ley Nikon fm w 50mm f/18 Nolan Maurer HP5 400, Nikon F3, Nikkor 35 mm Logan Garrett Kiwi Hayden Wander Chinese New Year display at the Bellagio’s conservatory in Las Vegas Iain Laurence Koi pond at the Bellagio’s conservatory in Las Vegas Nikon N65.

Below is a list of film letter codes to use as tags Note that tags with a space are surrounded by double quotation marks If you don't see your film listed here, please post a message in the group's film. Posted by James 4 May 16 29 Apr 16 Leave a comment on 4×5 Roses HP5 vs FP4 A couple of months ago, I loaded up a bunch of film 3 holders full of HP5 and 2 of FP4 I shot one holder of HP5 maybe a month ago, but they were horribly misfocused and not correctly exposed. Comparing Ilford Film Stocks Here are the B&W films we will be comparing in this article Ilford Delta (100, 400, 30) (find on Amazon)Ilford FP4 Plus (find on Amazon)Ilford HP5 Plus (find on Amazon)Ilford Pan F Plus (find on Amazon)Ilford XP2 Super (find on Amazon)Quick rundown on Ilford black and white films, most of their current offerings are bisected into two distinct lines – PLUS and.

Comparing Ilford Film Stocks Here are the B&W films we will be comparing in this article Ilford Delta (100, 400, 30) (find on Amazon)Ilford FP4 Plus (find on Amazon)Ilford HP5 Plus (find on Amazon)Ilford Pan F Plus (find on Amazon)Ilford XP2 Super (find on Amazon)Quick rundown on Ilford black and white films, most of their current offerings are bisected into two distinct lines – PLUS and. Ilford FP4, HP5, Delta 100 Full Strength and 11 dilution Kodak TRIX, TMX, TMY Full Strength and 11 dilution Note All films were Films were rated at the published ISO Exposures were made in a Nikon F3, and processing was carried out in a Jobo ATL2, 68 degrees F, rotation speed 75 RPM PREWET. The difference in grain between HP5 and FP4 is pretty obvious in 35mm, where an 8×10 print is an 8x enlargement;.

Ilford HP5 510Pyro 1100 400 65 65 65 21C Ilford HP5 777 stock 400 1115 1115 1115 24C. Ilford FP4, HP5, Delta 100 Full Strength and 11 dilution Kodak TRIX, TMX, TMY Full Strength and 11 dilution Note All films were Films were rated at the published ISO Exposures were made in a Nikon F3, and processing was carried out in a Jobo ATL2, 68 degrees F, rotation speed 75 RPM PREWET. Ilford HP5 400 B&W Film Profile/Review This tech page is for Ilford HP5 Film, or HP5PLUS This is a high speed B&W film that comes in 35mm roll, 1 roll, and various sheet sizes It is a panchromatic black and white negative film with a nominal rating of ISO 400.

FP4 1 FP4 35 HP5 PLUS is a high speed, medium contrast film making it especially suitable for action and it is also an excellent choice under all lighting conditions. Price 35mm Kentmere 400 (vs Delta 400 and HP5) At the time of writing 35mm Kentmere 400 film costs £358 a roll in the UK As a direct comparison 35mm Ilford HP5 Plus costs £454 a roll (25% more / ~£100 more each) Ilford also make their 35mm Ilford Delta 400 at £555 a roll (an additional ~£0 per roll) Ilford Delta is still cheap compared to the new Kodak TMax film prices (after. I started with TRIX, and then I tried TMAX and then Ilford's FP4, yadda yadda yadda I didn't have any serious problems with any of them, but I was only getting acceptable results, nothing spectacular Then comes along HP5 and it blew me away I get predictable and spectacular results every time now I will shoot no other B&W film besides HP5.

Ilford HP5 Plus, Black and White Print Film, 35 mm, ISO 400, 36 Exposures (Pack of 3) Ilford HP5 35mm, 36 exposures, 5 Rolls Five Pack of Ilford FP4 Plus 35mm Black & White Negative Film 36 Exp. The choice of a film depends on exposure I like to use Ilford HP5 Plus or Kodak TriX, Ilford FP4 Plus or Fomapan 100 if exposure is sufficient to shoot w/o tripod Reply Malcolm Apr 24, 19 Very interesting discussion What seems to be missing from the discussion about 13 dilution is that the developer is no longer superadditive and has. Introduction Spending some time with Google shows that there are numerous comparisons between Kodak TriX (400TX) and Ilford's HP5 film Are they the same?.

More uniform grain structure with finer grain compared to HP5 Grain size is closer to medium speed film like FP4 Images have exceptional sharpness and a "cleaner" look Choice of developer is more important and processing needs to be more precise than HP5 Longer fixing times than HP5. I always thought FP4 was lacking in character, but Big Will has proved me wrong on that However, I always thought HP5 in Rodinal was full of character, and is one of my alltime favourites Pan F is capable of wonderful results in a very different area, IR films are terrific, and if Ilford can be persuaded to make SFX again, it's a superb film. Ilford FP4 Plus 125 64 I processed Fomapans in Kodak D76 and Fomadon R09 — the images always were more contrasty than Ilford HP5 Plus shot in near the same conditions for example Considering your question about the base, Fomapan 100 type 1 film has polyester base 01mm thick, and 35mm film 35 mm film has cellulose triacetate base 0.

Ilford HP5 510Pyro 1100 400 65 65 65 21C Ilford HP5 777 stock 400 1115 1115 1115 24C. Author Topic Ilford Delta 100 vs FP4 (Read 4393 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic Indofunk SelfCoat and it came out great in HC110H for 10 min Figure I'll start with that for both the Delta100 and the FP4 I did find HP5 much more mid toney and less contrasty than TriX (in addition, I find TMax to be more midtoney. Posts about Ilford FP4 written by kevinallan FilmPhotographyBlog The blog previously known as kevinthephotographer filmsnotdead flowers fomapan fomapan 100 fp4 fuji Fujifim GA645Zi HC110 Hebrides Heritage Holga ilford Ilford FP4 ilford hp5 Ilford Pan F Infrared Intrepid kodak Kodak Portra 400 Kodak TMax Lake landscape Large Format.

Ilford HP5 400ISO black and white camera film review Contrasty, not too grainy, easy to develop and looks great Images taken on Leica Elmarit 28mm. The choice between Ilford FP4 Plus in a speed increasing developer, or Ilford HP5 Plus in a finegrain developer, is therefore likely to be a choice based on grain and tonality rather than on the speed difference, which might be 1/3 stop or less. Film Developer Dilution ASA/ISO 35mm 1 Sheet Temp Notes;.

Ilford FP4 Plus For high quality black and white photography, ILFORD FP4 PLUS is unrivalled Its very fine grain, outstanding sharpness and More info Ilford HP5 Plus ILFORD HP5 PLUS is a high speed, medium contrast film making it especially suitable for action and press photography and also More info Ilford Ortho Plus. However, FP4 does have a different look, with less shadow detail and more highlight detail in a given composition when compared to the same shot on FP4 I would use both, personally;. On and On and On Let's take as objective look as possible between the two emulsions and see what the deal is.

I was supposed to compare 4 development techniques with a roll of Ilford FP4 but had some trouble with a roll that got jammed into my camera and ruined my initial plan Instead, I shot an entire roll of Ilford HP5 in my Hasselblad Xpan and divided the roll in 4 strips. Ilford HP5 vs Ilford Delta 400 Since Carmencita’s birth in 12 we have carefully handled, developed, and scanned many types of black and white films We have learned the unique qualities that each type of black and white film possess and how they can impact the emotion in a photograph. On and On and On Let's take as objective look as possible between the two emulsions and see what the deal is.

Ilford FP4 Plus – 35mm roll $999 Ilford HP5 Plus Jim via Creative Commons HP5 Plus is one of the most popular films for students Providing a somewhat lower contrast image on a highersensitivity ISO 400 stock, HP5 is the yang to FP4’s yin Ilford HP5 Plus – 1 roll $599 Ilford HP5 Plus – 35mm roll $699 Ilford SFX 0 Antony. I've heard that HP5 is a low contrast film so doesn't really like low contrast N dev type situations and FP4 is contrasty so better for N and less. Is one better than the other?.

Ilford FP4 Plus 125 64 I processed Fomapans in Kodak D76 and Fomadon R09 — the images always were more contrasty than Ilford HP5 Plus shot in near the same conditions for example Considering your question about the base, Fomapan 100 type 1 film has polyester base 01mm thick, and 35mm film 35 mm film has cellulose triacetate base 0. I was supposed to compare 4 development techniques with a roll of Ilford FP4 but had some trouble with a roll that got jammed into my camera and ruined my initial plan Instead, I shot an entire roll of Ilford HP5 in my Hasselblad Xpan and divided the roll in 4 strips. To get the look I wanted I came away committed to shooting ILFORD HP5 PLUS, exposed at EI 250, developed at 400 or pushed to 1600, using Kodak D76 (and the chart on the wall) But for whatever reason, I had only really ever shot one 100 speed black and white film.

FP4 is a higher contrast film than HP5 Therefore, it adds contrast to a flatly lit scene (fog, or overcast conditions) However, has a lower sensitivity to light HP5 is a lower contrast film Therefore, it reduces the contrast to a harshly lit scene (outdoors in bright sunlight). But for 4×5, an 11×14 or 16× print is only about a 3 or 4x enlargement Do you think the difference in grain would even be visible at those sizes?. Film Developer Dilution ASA/ISO 35mm 1 Sheet Temp Notes;.

These films sit alongside and benefit from the same rigorous production and quality control processes as all ILFORD PHOTO films While their emulsion is made using the same technology as HP5 and FP4, the key difference is that they contain less silver and therefore don't offer the same quality, versatility or characteristics. Buy black & white films from FilmFolk https//wwwfilmfolkcom/Have them processed and scanned at Sunny16 Lab http//wwwsunny16labcom/This was our firs.